So Coulson’s phone hacker justified it by saying there was a public interest angle, but the story Coulson published did not contain any of that public-interest material, and publication took place after he had been made aware that the information had been gathered via phone hacking. Hmm.
This is a phone hacking trial and Coulson admitted knowledge of phone hacking to publish a “salacious story”. Hmm.
Or have I got that wrong?

Inforrm's Blog

Phone hacking claimsDay 117: Andy Coulson made no attempt to inquire into the extent of phone hacking at the News of the World in 2004 after the chief reporter eavesdropped the messages of the Home Secretary, the Old Bailey was told today.

View original post 461 more words

Advertisements