38 degrees, age, authority, avoidance, band, bedroom tax, below, benefit, benefits, boo, break, campaign, cap, Chancellor, change, Coalition, Conservative, council, credit, cut, Daily Politics, demonstration, Department for Work and Pensions, disability, disabled, DWP, Employment and Support Allowance, ESA, exploit, fair, games, George Osborne, Gideon, government, Grant Shapps, Iain Duncan Smith, inflation, Interest, legislation, Liberal, Liberal Democrat, living wage, local, make work pay, Mandatory Work Activity, Mike Sivier, mikesivier, money, mortgage, motion, Olympic, online, paddock, Parliament, people, petition, politics, poverty, rally, retrospective, social security, Tatton, tax, taxpayer, top, Tories, Tory, unemployment, unfair, Vox Political, WCA, welfare, work capability assessment, work placement provider, Workfare, working
You know the Tories are scraping the bottom of the barrel when they wheel out
Gideon George Osborne to defend benefit changes as “fair”.
It’s hilarious (unintentionally, I’m sure) that they’re wheeling out a man whose appearance in last year’s Olympic Games prompted an international crowd in a full-to-capacity stadium to ‘boo’ him – in order to try to popularise their unjustifiable crimes against the poor.
This is a man whose only proper job was folding towels at a department store, if I recall correctly!
He’s due to make a speech at 12.30pm today (April 2, so it can’t even be defended as an April Fool) in which he is expected to say the Tory cuts mean “this month we will make work pay”, and nine out of 10 working households will be better-off.
They’ll be better of than the remaining one-tenth of households, maybe, but the Tories are never going to convince intelligent people that they’re making work pay by cutting anything! Common sense tells us that, in a country where wages are deeply depressed (such as the UK – oh yes they are) the only way to make work pay is to offer a living wage!
But what can we expect from a political organisation that is now focusing its efforts on redefining the dictionary?
The lexicon here at Vox Political gives multiple definitions for the word “fair”, so I’ll pick out those that may be applied, as follows:
“1. Reasonable or unbiased.” The changes include a below-inflation cap for people on working-age benefits and tax credits, meaning they will become worse-off, year-on-year, while the cap remains in place. Meanwhile, people in the top tax band – who therefore take home the most pay – are getting a £100,000 tax break. Reasonable? No. Unbiased? Not a chance in hell.
Let’s also remember that Osborne is the Chancellor who thought it was a good idea to promote tax avoidance schemes on the Daily Politics TV show, on January 9 this year.
“2. According to the rules.” The Tory-led Coalition is the government that changes the rules to suit itself. Let’s all remember that when Iain Duncan Smith’s Department for Work and Pensions was found, by a court, to have been breaking the law by imposing sanctions against people who refused to take part in the ridiculous ‘Mandatory Work Activity’ schemes that take more than a billion pounds out of the economy every year (almost £900 million for companies offering placements, along with hundreds of millions more for ‘Work Placement Provider’ companies), this administration’s answer was to introduce retrospective legislation to wipe away its guilt.
“3. Describing light-coloured hair or skin, or somebody with this.” Let’s widen this definition a little; a person who is “fair to look at” would be deemed attractive, so let’s go with that. Are these changes attractive? Most definitely not. They are designed to make the claiming of benefits unattractive.
“4. Sizeable, as in ‘a fair number of responses’.” This is accurate – the changes will affect millions of homes, throwing many of them into abject poverty.
“5. Better than acceptable.” If they were acceptable, then we would not have seen thousands of people demonstrating against the new Bedroom Tax, in towns and cities across the UK. Nor would we have seen the huge amount of campaigning against the benefit changes online and via petitions. And there will be motions against implementing the tax in local authorities up and down the country. The people responsible for them don’t think these changes are acceptable; nor should you.
“6. No more than average.” It could be suggested that Grant Shapps has been saying the more stringent application of the Work Capability Assessment to applicants for Employment and Support Allowance has created a more representative average number of claims by ensuring 878,000 people dropped their claims when faced by those changes – but, wait a moment, this has been exposed as a lie, hasn’t it? In fact, the number of people dropping their claims has been revealed – by official DWP figures – to be the natural wastage you get from people getting better or finding work they can do while ill, and the number of people receiving the benefit has, in fact, risen.
“7. Not stormy or cloudy.” Clearly the storm of protest around these changes renders this definition irrelevant.
Osborne, who not only advocates tax avoidance but allegedly participates in it himself – he was the target of a campaign by 38 Degrees, early in the life of this Parliament – also seems a strange choice to talk about fairness and making work pay, because of his involvement in a ‘get rich quick’ scheme which was extremely unfair and had nothing to do with work.
Readers of this blog may remember that Osborne used taxpayers’ money to pay mortgage interest on a farmhouse and associated land that he claimed to use for Parliamentary purposes in his Tatton constituency (this has not been proved), and then sold the properties for around £1 million, pocketing the lot. He didn’t work for the money, and this exploitation of the taxpayer can hardly be considered fair – but he got away with it because his privileged position as an MP, apparently, allows it.
This seems more likely.
Grant Shapps, the man who hides behind false aliases to run dubious businesses. Osborne the income tax dodger and expenses embezzler. That sums the pair of them up.
Mike Sivier said:
Update 12.58pm: That has to have been about the least convincing speech, by a government member, of our lifetime. Just from the delivery, you get the impression even HE didn’t believe what he was saying!
I noted that he practically punctuated every broad statement by saying something on the lines of ‘because this is fair to YOU, the people who are working’ YOU are the tax payers, and adding YOU want to see your tax spent wisely (OH YEAH Georgey boy……so you go spend it on what? – You and your miserable lying, thieving, corrupt, money laundering, price fixing chums old boy?)
Reblogged this on kickingthecat.
Paul Smyth said:
Reblogged this on The Greater Fool.
Phil The Folk said:
I wish the BBC reporters would challenge them when they say it’s taxpayers money, cos it’s the very same taxpayers that are being hit by these cuts, and those who have paid in all their lives! Have emailed the BBC with a complanit!
The BBC with that well known communist Lord Patten at the helm?? LOL! IDSS tells us has been “monitoring” the Beeb this past 12 months for “left wing bias”. Authoritarianism at its’ finest then.
Smiling Carcass said:
So, maybe he can explain how cutting the minimum wage makes work more attractive?
Quite right, Smiling C. “Making work pay” was only ever a lie to strip our welfare provision and take away the rights of workers, and keep the wages low and private company profits high
How does sanctioning people make work more attractive? Starve ’em all into none existent jobs?? Beware the logical gaps, here come the Tories….
Sadly for Osborne, he has fewer viable economic strategies than he has chins and that’s why we’re fiscally screwed.
He and Iain Duncan Smith are going to cooperatively bring this country to its knees. They’re mutually damaging to each other. Osborne is restricting job creation via cuts and Duncan Smith is restricting job creation via workfare. They depend on each other to boost new life into the economy but they’re both wholly inept.
The problem is it is working. The constant “you the hard working taxpayer” is probably the most used phrase on tv in the last 2 years.
If you read all the posts on most of the sites then there is a fair percentage who agree completely with all the changes.
Given the Labour party’s lack of public condemnation and their outright collusion with the Tories then this is only to be expected. If the Labour party think these reforms are ok and true then so will the majority of working people. Sad but true.
I haven’t seen one single interview so far from any media section that has grilled DWP or IDS on any aspect of the reforms.
Especially the £5 billion or so to be spent to try and shoehorn 2.5 million unemployed and all the part timers, who will desperately need second jobs or more hours, into half a million jobs ?? That for me is the most basic question of all.